typo fix #1

strk · 2012-02-22T10:36:20Z

not much to say, just a typo fix

mhagander · 2012-02-22T13:28:13Z

This is just a mirror of PostgreSQL, and not the development repo. Please see http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch for how to submit a patch to PostgreSQL.

strk · 2012-02-22T13:52:07Z

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:28:14AM -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:

This is just a mirror of PostgreSQL, and not the development repo. Please see http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch for how to submit a patch to PostgreSQL.

Got it, thanks. Sent there.

--strk;

These functions must be careful that they return the intended value of errno to their callers. There were several scenarios where this might not happen: 1. The recent SSL renegotiation patch added a hunk of code that would execute after setting errno. In the first place, it's doubtful that we should consider renegotiation to be successfully completed after a failure, and in the second, there's no real guarantee that the called OpenSSL routines wouldn't clobber errno. Fix by not executing that hunk except during success exit. 2. errno was left in an unknown state in case of an unrecognized return code from SSL_get_error(). While this is a "can't happen" case, it seems like a good idea to be sure we know what would happen, so reset errno to ECONNRESET in such cases. (The corresponding code in libpq's fe-secure.c already did this.) 3. There was an (undocumented) assumption that client_read_ended() wouldn't change errno. While true in the current state of the code, this seems less than future-proof. Add explicit saving/restoring of errno to make sure that changes in the called functions won't break things. I see no need to back-patch, since #1 is new code and the other two issues are mostly hypothetical. Per discussion with Amit Kapila.

These functions must be careful that they return the intended value of errno to their callers. There were several scenarios where this might not happen: 1. The recent SSL renegotiation patch added a hunk of code that would execute after setting errno. In the first place, it's doubtful that we should consider renegotiation to be successfully completed after a failure, and in the second, there's no real guarantee that the called OpenSSL routines wouldn't clobber errno. Fix by not executing that hunk except during success exit. 2. errno was left in an unknown state in case of an unrecognized return code from SSL_get_error(). While this is a "can't happen" case, it seems like a good idea to be sure we know what would happen, so reset errno to ECONNRESET in such cases. (The corresponding code in libpq's fe-secure.c already did this.) 3. There was an (undocumented) assumption that client_read_ended() wouldn't change errno. While true in the current state of the code, this seems less than future-proof. Add explicit saving/restoring of errno to make sure that changes in the called functions won't break things. I see no need to back-patch, since postgres#1 is new code and the other two issues are mostly hypothetical. Per discussion with Amit Kapila.

Includes documentation for executor README. A high-level handling of approach postgres#2 to value locking also appears there, since in contrast with design postgres#1, that is something that lives in the head of the executor.

refresh_by_match_merge() has some issues in the way it builds a SQL query to construct the "diff" table: 1. It doesn't require the selected unique index(es) to be indimmediate. 2. It doesn't pay attention to the particular equality semantics enforced by a given index, but just assumes that they must be those of the column datatype's default btree opclass. 3. It doesn't check that the indexes are btrees. 4. It's insufficiently careful to ensure that the parser will pick the intended operator when parsing the query. (This would have been a security bug before CVE-2018-1058.) 5. It's not careful about indexes on system columns. The way to fix #4 is to make use of the existing code in ri_triggers.c for generating an arbitrary binary operator clause. I chose to move that to ruleutils.c, since that seems a more reasonable place to be exporting such functionality from than ri_triggers.c. While #1, #3, and #5 are just latent given existing feature restrictions, and #2 doesn't arise in the core system for lack of alternate opclasses with different equality behaviors, #4 seems like an issue worth back-patching. That's the bulk of the change anyway, so just back-patch the whole thing to 9.4 where this code was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13836.1521413227@sss.pgh.pa.us

The original setup for dependencies of partitioned objects had serious problems: 1. It did not verify that a drop cascading to a partition-child object also cascaded to at least one of the object's partition parents. Now, normally a child object would share all its dependencies with one or another parent (e.g. a child index's opclass dependencies would be shared with the parent index), so that this oversight is usually harmless. But if some dependency failed to fit this pattern, the child could be dropped while all its parents remain, creating a logically broken situation. (It's easy to construct artificial cases that break it, such as attaching an unrelated extension dependency to the child object and then dropping the extension. I'm not sure if any less-artificial cases exist.) 2. Management of partition dependencies during ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION was complicated and buggy; for example, after detaching a partition table it was possible to create cases where a formerly-child index should be dropped and was not, because the correct set of dependencies had not been reconstructed. Less seriously, because multiple partition relationships were represented identically in pg_depend, there was an order-of-traversal dependency on which partition parent was cited in error messages. We also had some pre-existing order-of-traversal hazards for error messages related to internal and extension dependencies. This is cosmetic to users but causes testing problems. To fix #1, add a check at the end of the partition tree traversal to ensure that at least one partition parent got deleted. To fix #2, establish a new policy that partition dependencies are in addition to, not instead of, a child object's usual dependencies; in this way ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION need not cope with adding or removing the usual dependencies. To fix the cosmetic problem, distinguish between primary and secondary partition dependency entries in pg_depend, by giving them different deptypes. (They behave identically except for having different priorities for being cited in error messages.) This means that the former 'I' dependency type is replaced with new 'P' and 'S' types. This also fixes a longstanding bug that after handling an internal dependency by recursing to the owning object, findDependentObjects did not verify that the current target was now scheduled for deletion, and did not apply the current recursion level's objflags to it. Perhaps that should be back-patched; but in the back branches it would only matter if some concurrent transaction had removed the internal-linkage pg_depend entry before the recursive call found it, or the recursive call somehow failed to find it, both of which seem unlikely. Catversion bump because the contents of pg_depend change for partitioning relationships. Patch HEAD only. It's annoying that we're not fixing #2 in v11, but there seems no practical way to do so given that the problem is exactly a poor choice of what entries to put in pg_depend. We can't really fix that while staying compatible with what's in pg_depend in existing v11 installations. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzkypv1R+teZrr71U23J578NnTBt2X8+Y=Odr4pOdW1rXg@mail.gmail.com

…tions. Commit 3d956d9 added support for update row movement in postgres_fdw. This patch fixes the following issues introduced by that commit: * When a remote partition chosen to insert routed rows into was also an UPDATE subplan target rel that would be updated later, the UPDATE that used a direct modification plan modified those routed rows incorrectly because those routed rows were visible to the later UPDATE command. The right fix for this would be to have some way in postgres_fdw in which the later UPDATE command ignores those routed rows, but it seems hard to do so with the current infrastructure. For now throw an error in that case. * When a remote partition chosen to insert routed rows into was also an UPDATE subplan target rel, fmstate created for the UPDATE that used a non-direct modification plan was mistakenly overridden by another fmstate created for inserting those routed rows into the partition. This caused 1) server crash when the partition would be updated later, and 2) resource leak when the partition had been already updated. To avoid that, adjust the treatment of the fmstate for the inserting. As for #1, since we would also have the incorrectness issue as mentioned above, error out in that case as well. Update the docs to mention that postgres_fdw currently does not handle the case where a remote partition chosen to insert a routed row into is also an UPDATE subplan target rel that will be updated later. Author: Amit Langote and Etsuro Fujita Reviewed-by: Amit Langote Backpatch-through: 11 where row movement in postgres_fdw was added Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21e7eaa4-0d4d-20c2-a1f7-c7e96f4ce440@lab.ntt.co.jp

repo-lockdown · 2019-06-17T13:24:41Z

Thanks for your Pull Request! 😄 This repo on GitHub is just a mirror of our real git repositories though, and can't really handle PRs. 😦 Hopefully you can redo the PR, and direct it to the git.postgresql.org repos? We have a developer guide, if that helps: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/So,_you_want_to_be_a_developer%3F. If this was a PR for pgAdmin, please visit https://www.pgadmin.org/docs/pgadmin4/dev/submitting_patches.html.

Due to how pg_size_pretty(bigint) was implemented, it's possible that when given a negative number of bytes that the returning value would not match the equivalent positive return value when given the equivalent positive number of bytes. This was due to two separate issues. 1. The function used bit shifting to convert the number of bytes into larger units. The rounding performed by bit shifting is not the same as dividing. For example -3 >> 1 = -2, but -3 / 2 = -1. These two operations are only equivalent with positive numbers. 2. The half_rounded() macro rounded towards positive infinity. This meant that negative numbers rounded towards zero and positive numbers rounded away from zero. Here we fix #1 by dividing the values instead of bit shifting. We fix #2 by adjusting the half_rounded macro always to round away from zero. Additionally, adjust the pg_size_pretty(numeric) function to be more explicit that it's using division rather than bit shifting. A casual observer might have believed bit shifting was used due to a static function being named numeric_shift_right. However, that function was calculating the divisor from the number of bits and performed division. Here we make that more clear. This change is just cosmetic and does not affect the return value of the numeric version of the function. Here we also add a set of regression tests both versions of pg_size_pretty() which test the values directly before and after the function switches to the next unit. This bug was introduced in 8a1fab3. Prior to that negative values were always displayed in bytes. Author: Dean Rasheed, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnNW4HsmZnxhfezR5FuiGgp+mkY4AzcL5eRGO4fuadWg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6, where the bug was introduced.

typo fix

cfca950

mhagander closed this Feb 22, 2012

PJMODOS referenced this pull request in 2ndQuadrant/postgres Feb 2, 2016

Catalog overhaul #1

a6714ee

repo-lockdown bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2019

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

typo fix #1

typo fix #1

strk commented Feb 22, 2012

mhagander commented Feb 22, 2012

strk commented Feb 22, 2012

repo-lockdown bot commented Jun 17, 2019

typo fix #1

typo fix #1

Conversation

strk commented Feb 22, 2012

mhagander commented Feb 22, 2012

strk commented Feb 22, 2012

repo-lockdown bot commented Jun 17, 2019