Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add basic vector operations #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2022
Merged

add basic vector operations #79

merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2022

Conversation

montanalow
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@montanalow montanalow requested a review from levkk May 4, 2022 15:20
@montanalow montanalow force-pushed the montana/vectors branch 2 times, most recently from 0453a08 to 12ca428 Compare May 4, 2022 15:34
levkk
levkk approved these changes May 4, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@levkk levkk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very cool. I'm going to start thinking about how we can add some tests. Postgres extensions and Postgres itself has "output tests" where they just run some test SQL and compare the output to what they expect, we could try that eventually.

@montanalow montanalow force-pushed the montana/vectors branch 3 times, most recently from 764b58b to c19d6fe Compare May 4, 2022 16:35
@montanalow montanalow merged commit 05bc388 into master May 4, 2022
@montanalow montanalow deleted the montana/vectors branch May 4, 2022 16:43
SilasMarvin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@montanalow
Merge pull request #79 from postgresml/montana/vectors
e8545c8 
add basic vector operations
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@levkk levkk levkk approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@montanalow @levkk