-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pouchdb-validation #247
pouchdb-validation #247
Conversation
…d to the registry if necessary. For now just there's a script that links them locally (and installs all their dependencies).
…he plug-ins (the largest is now 4.1kb min+gzip). Added JS Coverage info. Some new tests.
…dapter. Validation doesn't occur offline if the server handles it. No test suite regressions, but both are still experimental. (And JS coverage is lower.)
… A few bug fixes. Code coverage to 100% (python, js); no more fixmes/todos. Pretty much only pouchdb.mapping is now left as experimental.
… the node modules.
…x to the nodejs test suite, some documentation changes.
… much untested). Also validation update (will become 1.1.0).
… some improvements to coroutines (nesting them, most notably)
…passes the pouchdb-server test suite.
…& validation wrappers. Untested additions to the security plug-in (but no regressions).
…rotections for them like in CouchDB). No regressions, but JS test coverage isn't complete yet.
a.k.a. making it play nice with Kneden.
validate_doc_update functions on the client side. A browser version is | ||
available. | ||
|
||
See also [pouchdb-validation's documentation](http://pythonhosted.org/Python-PouchDB/js-plugins.html#pouchdb-validation-plug-in) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we point this to our mono-repo. Or mention it is part of the mono-repo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I plan to do a post-monorepo-merge README cleanup, there are several things that need to be done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work
part of #197