Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI shows Version 4.1.3 but 4.1.4 is installed #173

Open
banlex73 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

UI shows Version 4.1.3 but 4.1.4 is installed #173

banlex73 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@banlex73
Copy link

A bit confusing
image
but
yum list powa_14-web
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Installed Packages
powa_14-web.x86_64 4.1.4-1.rhel7

@rjuju rjuju self-assigned this May 31, 2023
@rjuju
Copy link
Member

rjuju commented May 31, 2023

Hi,

it's unfortunately a (known) package issue, see https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/7478.

@devrimgunduz is there anything I can do to help?

@devrimgunduz
Copy link

Hi @rjuju ,

Apologies for the delay.

So, I can now work on this, but need help about naming.

Currently we have 3 packages:

  • powa_collector (separate package)
  • powa-web
  • powa (the archivist)

...and yes, there is a packaging issue.

We will keep the first two, but do you want me to rename powa to powa-archivist, or keep it as it?

Thanks!

Regards, Devrim

@rjuju
Copy link
Member

rjuju commented Sep 19, 2023

Hi @devrimgunduz

no worries, and thanks for your hard work!

I think that on the apt side there's a powa-archivist package, so having the same name for rpm could be nice but maybe it could lead to some headache when transitioning. If yes could the powa package become a metapackage that has dependencies on the main extensions, like powa-archivist, pg_qualstats, pg_stat_kcache and pg_track_settings? I wouldn't put powa-web or powa-collector with it as the remote mode is more useful, so you will probably install those on one or two different servers.

@devrimgunduz
Copy link

@rjuju ack, thanks! Starting now. I'm not that worried about transition, as the packaging is already broken and we'll keep powa package.

@rjuju
Copy link
Member

rjuju commented Sep 21, 2023

Ah I see, then I agree the transition shouldn't be an issue :) Thanks a lot!

@devrimgunduz
Copy link

Should be fixed in the latest release set.

There are now 4 packages (XY stands for PostgreSQL major version):

powa_XY : Meta package (pulls powa_archivist_XY, pg_qualstats_XY, pg_stat_kcache_XY and hypopg_XY (

powa-collector:

powa-archivist_XY

powa-web

Regards, Devrim

@rjuju
Copy link
Member

rjuju commented Nov 8, 2023

Thanks a lot @devrimgunduz !

For the record, I see that you added the last powa-archivist releases (4.2.0 and 4.2.1) but powa-web hasn't been bumped and is still showing 4.1.4. Is it an oversight or is there anything missing on my side?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants