Dynamic simulation logs #314
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
…o logs Add simulation error integration test Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
flo-dup
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2023
|
|
||
| setDynawoLog(outputsFolder); | ||
| // Error file | ||
| Path errorFile = workingDir.resolve(ERROR_FILENAME); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm just having questions about the code below, isn't it a bit weak to rely on the errorFile being there and on its content if it is? I mean, if the error file is not there, we could still try to read the output for instance. And even if there's an error message in the file matching the content, there might still be an output, so it's worth trying to read them.
Let's discuss about those later, as it's ok to do a pre-release with this.
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information:
Dependent on #2788