Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix transformer voltage control outer loop AFTER GENERATOR #1038

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

annetill
Copy link
Member

@annetill annetill commented May 28, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

No, but it occurs on real RTE network where now we have some transformers with a voltage control on 225 kV (transformers used for off shore wind farm for example). So the highest nominal voltage controlled by transformers is quite high and too high to determine which generators must have its voltage control disabled during outer loop.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Just a proposal, I have no good idea of the good fix. I would like an automatic way, that could analysed generator voltage controls or transformer voltage controls, or both. But we need also a parameter.

We must include in this PR all the good idea of #1032 : parameter, VSC management, etc.

image

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
annetill and others added 4 commits May 29, 2024 11:46
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@vidaldid-rte vidaldid-rte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ambiguity in the value for automatic computation of limit (0 or -1).
I think that 0 should mean NO LIMIT, and should not be used for AUTO.

Some other minor comments.

@geofjamg
Copy link
Member

Ambiguity in the value for automatic computation of limit (0 or -1). I think that 0 should mean NO LIMIT, and should not be used for AUTO.

Some other minor comments.

What could be the purpose of no limit ?

geofjamg and others added 8 commits May 30, 2024 11:26
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@vidaldid-rte
Copy link
Contributor

Ambiguity in the value for automatic computation of limit (0 or -1). I think that 0 should mean NO LIMIT, and should not be used for AUTO.
Some other minor comments.

What could be the purpose of no limit ?

Not much sense according to the algo logic, but from my experiments it works well and without convergence issues.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 31, 2024

@annetill annetill merged commit adf0a80 into main May 31, 2024
6 checks passed
@annetill annetill deleted the fix_transfo_after_voltage_control branch May 31, 2024 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants