You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now len() API does a full table walk to count the number of items indexed. Since we cannot guarantee point-in-time-snapshot, why don't we maintain n_count that gets atomically incremented or decremented for insert/delete operations. This can make len() call very cheap.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now len() API does a full table walk to count the number of items indexed. Since we cannot guarantee point-in-time-snapshot, why don't we maintain n_count that gets atomically incremented or decremented for insert/delete operations. This can make len() call very cheap.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: