Issue 4209: Bump versions of dependencies

[tkaitchuck]

Change log description

• Update versions of dependencies.

Purpose of the change
Fixes #4209

What the code does
Increases the versions of all of our current dependencies without breaking any code/tests.

How to verify it
We should run all tests against this branch.

[ravisharda]

The PR CI Build is failing with compilation error.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4210 into master will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4210      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     81.67%   81.74%   +0.07%     
- Complexity    10103    10114      +11     
============================================
  Files           672      672              
  Lines         37815    37813       -2     
  Branches       3667     3667              
============================================
+ Hits          30884    30910      +26     
+ Misses         4845     4830      -15     
+ Partials       2086     2073      -13

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...avega/segmentstore/server/host/ServiceStarter.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...a/io/pravega/controller/metrics/StreamMetrics.java	73.21% <0%> (-5.36%)	10% <0%> (-1%)
.../server/attributes/SegmentAttributeBTreeIndex.java	89.03% <0%> (-1%)	74% <0%> (-2%)
...pravega/controller/store/stream/ZKStoreHelper.java	75% <0%> (-0.84%)	69% <0%> (ø)
...o/pravega/controller/server/ControllerService.java	80.3% <0%> (-0.78%)	70% <0%> (-1%)
...ntstore/storage/impl/bookkeeper/BookKeeperLog.java	80.79% <0%> (-0.29%)	77% <0%> (-1%)
...ga/controller/task/Stream/StreamMetadataTasks.java	86.11% <0%> (ø)	174% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...o/pravega/segmentstore/server/logs/DurableLog.java	90.95% <0%> (+0.5%)	67% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
...ver/containers/StreamSegmentContainerMetadata.java	97.45% <0%> (+0.63%)	54% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
...main/java/io/pravega/storage/hdfs/HDFSStorage.java	74.37% <0%> (+0.71%)	51% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
... and 9 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 359cbcc...5bb67e1. Read the comment docs.

[ravisharda]

LGTM.

[shiveshr]

why are we updating generated file?

[tkaitchuck]

Otherwise the build fails with a compilation error.
There is no functional change here, this just suppresses the warnings from importing a deprecated class. Which would normally be a warning, but our build is set to treat warnings as errors and fail the build. Originally I just changed that behaviour but based on feedback, it seemed better to not remove that safety net for the sake of preserving one generated file in it's unmodified state.

Once there is an update to the code generator to use non-deprecated code, we should be able to re-generate the file and leave it unmodified.

[fpj]

Given the constraints in front of us, I'd say that we modify the file and create a separate issue explaining the problem and pointing to the jackson issue. The new issue should also say that once the jackson issue is resolved, we need to upgrade and regenerate the file.

[shiveshr]

@tkaitchuck can you please open an issue for the same.

[tkaitchuck]

Created #4224

[shiveshr]

Blocking because we are modifying a generated file. Please revert that file and rest all looks good.

[tkaitchuck]

Coverage is at 0% because changes are in the gradle file, and the service starter which is only used by integration tests. (Which don't count towards the coverage metric)