PR Review Process: Adding RTD, UserId. General modernization.

PR_REVIEW.md

@@ -6,48 +6,70 @@ If the PR is for a standard bid adapter or a standard analytics adapter, just th
 For modules and core platform updates, the initial reviewer should request an additional team member to review as a sanity check. Merge should only happen when the PR has 2 `LGTM` from the core team and a documentation PR if required.
 
 ### General PR review Process
+- All required global and bidder-adapter rules defined in the [Module Rules](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/module-rules.html) must be followed. Please review these rules often - we depend on reviewers to enforce them.
 - Checkout the branch (these instructions are available on the github PR page as well).
 - Verify PR is a single change type. Example, refactor OR bugfix. If more than 1 type, ask submitter to break out requests.
-- Verify code under review has at least 80% unit test coverage. If legacy code has no unit test coverage, ask for unit tests to be included in the PR.
+- Verify code under review has at least 80% unit test coverage. If legacy code doesn't have enough unit test coverage, require that additional unit tests to be included in the PR.
 - Verify tests are green in Travis-ci + local build by running `gulp serve` | `gulp test`
 - Verify no code quality violations are present from linting (should be reported in terminal)
+- Make sure the code is not setting cookies or localstorage directly -- it must use the `StorageManager`.
 - Review for obvious errors or bad coding practice / use best judgement here.
 - If the change is a new feature / change to core prebid.js - review the change with a Tech Lead on the project and make sure they agree with the nature of change.
 - If the change results in needing updates to docs (such as public API change, module interface etc), add a label for "needs docs" and inform the submitter they must submit a docs PR to update the appropriate area of Prebid.org **before the PR can merge**. Help them with finding where the docs are located on prebid.org if needed. 
-  - Below are some examples of bidder specific updates that should require docs update (in their dev-docs/bidders/BIDDER.md file):
-    - If they support the GDPR consentManagement module and TCF1, add `gdpr_supported: true`
-    - If they support the GDPR consentManagement module and TCF2, add `tcf2_supported: true`
-    - If they support the US Privacy consentManagementUsp module, add `usp_supported: true`
-    - If they support one or more userId modules, add `userId: (list of supported vendors)`
-    - If they support video and/or native mediaTypes add `media_types: video, native`. Note that display is added by default. If you don't support display, add "no-display" as the first entry, e.g. `media_types: no-display, native`
-    - If they support COPPA, add `coppa_supported: true`
-    - If they support SChain, add `schain_supported: true`
-    - If their bidder doesn't work well with safeframed creatives, add `safeframes_ok: false`. This will alert publishers to not use safeframed creatives when creating the ad server entries for their bidder.
-    - If they're setting a deal ID in some scenarios, add `bidder_supports_deals: true`
-    - If they have an IAB Global Vendor List ID, add `gvl_id: ID`. There's no default.
-- If all above is good, add a `LGTM` comment and request 1 additional core member to review.
-- Once there is 2 `LGTM` on the PR, merge to master
-- Ask the submitter to add a PR for documentation if applicable.
+- If all above is good, add a `LGTM` comment and, if the change is in PBS-core or is an important module like the prebidServerBidAdapter, request 1 additional core member to review.
+- Once there are 2 `LGTM` on the PR, merge to master
 - Add a line into the [draft release](https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/releases) notes for this submission. If no draft release is available, create one using [this template]( https://gist.github.com/mkendall07/c3af6f4691bed8a46738b3675cb5a479)
-- Add the PR to the appropriate project board (I.E. 1.23.0 Release) for the week, [see](https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/projects)
 
-### New Adapter or updates to adapter process
-- Follow steps above for general review process. In addition, please verify the following:
+### Reviewing a New or Updated Bid Adapter
+Documentation they're supposed to be following is https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/bidder-adaptor.html
+
+Follow steps above for general review process. In addition, please verify the following:
 - Verify that bidder has submitted valid bid params and that bids are being received.
 - Verify that bidder is not manipulating the prebid.js auction in any way or doing things that go against the principles of the project. If unsure check with the Tech Lead.
 - Verify that code re-use is being done properly and that changes introduced by a bidder don't impact other bidders.
 - If the adapter being submitted is an alias type, check with the bidder contact that is being aliased to make sure it's allowed.
-- All required global and bidder-adapter rules defined in the [Module Rules](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/module-rules.html) must be followed. Please review these rules often - we depend on reviewers to enforce them.
 - All bidder parameter conventions must be followed:
     - Video params must be read from AdUnit.mediaTypes.video when available; however bidder config can override the ad unit. 
     - First party data must be read from [`fpd.context` and `fpd.user`](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/publisher-api-reference.html#setConfig-fpd).
     - Adapters that accept a floor parameter must also support the [floors module](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/modules/floors.html) -- look for a call to the `getFloors()` function.
     - Adapters cannot accept an schain parameter. Rather, they must look for the schain parameter at bidRequest.schain.
     - The bidRequest page referrer must checked in addition to any bidder-specific parameter.
     - If they're getting the COPPA flag, it must come from config.getConfig('coppa');
-
+- Below are some examples of bidder specific updates that should require docs update (in their dev-docs/bidders/BIDDER.md file):
+    - If they support the GDPR consentManagement module and TCF1, add `gdpr_supported: true`
+    - If they support the GDPR consentManagement module and TCF2, add `tcf2_supported: true`
+    - If they support the US Privacy consentManagementUsp module, add `usp_supported: true`
+    - If they support one or more userId modules, add `userId: (list of supported vendors)`
+    - If they support video and/or native mediaTypes add `media_types: video, native`. Note that display is added by default. If you don't support display, add "no-display" as the first entry, e.g. `media_types: no-display, native`
+    - If they support COPPA, add `coppa_supported: true`
+    - If they support SChain, add `schain_supported: true`
+    - If their bidder doesn't work well with safeframed creatives, add `safeframes_ok: false`. This will alert publishers to not use safeframed creatives when creating the ad server entries for their bidder.
+    - If they're setting a deal ID in some scenarios, add `bidder_supports_deals: true`
+    - If they have an IAB Global Vendor List ID, add `gvl_id: ID`. There's no default.
 - After a new adapter is approved, let the submitter know they may open a PR in the [headerbid-expert repository](https://github.com/prebid/headerbid-expert) to have their adapter recognized by the [Headerbid Expert extension](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/headerbid-expert/cgfkddgbnfplidghapbbnngaogeldmop). The PR should be to the [bidder patterns file](https://github.com/prebid/headerbid-expert/blob/master/bidderPatterns.js), adding an entry with their adapter's name and the url the adapter uses to send and receive bid responses.
 
+### Reviewing a New or Updated Analytics Adapter
+Documentation they're supposed to be following is https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/integrate-with-the-prebid-analytics-api.html
+
+No additional steps above the general review process and making sure it conforms to the [Module Rules](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/module-rules.html).
+
+### Reviewing a New or Updated User ID Sub-Module
+Documentation they're supposed to be following is https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/modules/userId.html#id-providers
+
+Follow steps above for general review process. In addition:
+- Try running the new user ID module with a basic config and confirm it hits the endpoint and stores the results.
+- (under construction)
+
+### Reviewing a New or Updated Real-Time-Data Sub-Module
+Documentation they're supposed to be following is https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/add-rtd-submodule.html
+
+Follow steps above for general review process. In addition:
+- The RTD Provider must include a `providerRtdProvider.md` file. This file must have example parameters and document a sense of what to expect: what should change in the bidrequest, or what targeting data should be added?
+- Try running the new sub-module and confirm the provided test parameters.
+- Make sure the sub-module is "phoning home" as early as possible, but not more often than needed.
+- Consider whether the kind of data the module is obtaining could have privacy implications. If so, make sure they're utilizing the `consent` data passed to them.
+
+
 ## Ticket Coordinator
 
 Each week, Prebid Org assigns one person to keep an eye on incoming issues and PRs. Every Monday morning a reminder is