Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔥 delegate nan behavior to aggregators #294

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

🔥 delegate nan behavior to aggregators #294

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

jonasvdd
Copy link
Member

@jonasvdd jonasvdd commented Feb 13, 2024

Removed the check_nans argument of the FigureResampler constructor and its add_traces method. This argument was used to check for NaNs in the input data, but this is now handled by the nan_policy argument of specific aggregators (see for instance the constructor of the MinMax and MinMaxLTTB aggregator).

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3ad7dea) 96.42% compared to head (9fabda1) 96.49%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #294      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.42%   96.49%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1146     1141       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         1105     1101       -4     
+ Misses         41       40       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jonasvdd
Copy link
Member Author

Ready for review @jvdd!

)

# TODO -> integrate NANM4 (after the candlestick PR)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make an issue of this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree!

@jonasvdd jonasvdd self-assigned this Feb 15, 2024
@jonasvdd jonasvdd added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 15, 2024
@jvdd jvdd marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2024 09:55
Copy link
Member

@jvdd jvdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NaN support for M4 is still open

@jonasvdd
Copy link
Member Author

I added the issue, so this can be merged @jvdd?

@jvdd jvdd merged commit 17b6411 into main Mar 12, 2024
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants