Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve presolve checks #309

Closed
sandra-neubert opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #310
Closed

Improve presolve checks #309

sandra-neubert opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #310

Comments

@sandra-neubert
Copy link
Contributor

It would be nice if the presolve would throw a warning if the problem contained a single feature. This is because some users might not understand that prioritizr works best with multiple features.

@jeffreyhanson
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @sandra-neubert! Just in case anyone's interested, Sandra and I have been working through this PR togeather.

jeffreyhanson added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2024
* fix #309
* fix #312 
* fix #313
* update print() and summary() so text is printed faster
* fix namespace issues for internal S3 functions
* update NEWS with subsections and contributions 
* update package overview manual entry
* update pub record
* update news

---------

Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Hanson <jeffrey.hanson@uqconnect.edu.au>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants