Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Streamline generator architecture #530

Closed
timsuchanek opened this issue Sep 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Streamline generator architecture #530

timsuchanek opened this issue Sep 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/improvement An improvement to existing feature and code.
Milestone

Comments

@timsuchanek
Copy link
Contributor

Internal generators right now are treated completely differently than custom user generators. They both should work with the same mechanism. Then we also need to document this properly for generator developers.

@timsuchanek timsuchanek self-assigned this Sep 10, 2019
@janpio janpio added this to the Preview 12 milestone Sep 13, 2019
@janpio janpio added kind/improvement An improvement to existing feature and code. and removed process/candidate labels Sep 13, 2019
@divyenduz
Copy link
Contributor

SDK discussions happened, decisions were made, next step is to write a spec for it.

@timsuchanek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Released in the latest preview.

timsuchanek added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2020
Former-commit-id: 039c261
timsuchanek added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2020
Former-commit-id: 039c261
Former-commit-id: 158e42b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/improvement An improvement to existing feature and code.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants