Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add link to the explainer for legal effects details #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

AramZS
Copy link
Contributor

@AramZS AramZS commented Jan 25, 2024

In order to address concerns about updated to the legal effects and remove concerns about delays stemming from WG workflows that might be involved with future modification we aim to address updates to legal effects in the explainer and link to it within the specification. This hopefully will address #53

@SebastianZimmeck SebastianZimmeck self-requested a review March 7, 2024 21:50
Copy link
Member

@chrisn chrisn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest going further and moving the entire section to the explainer. As the original issue discussed, legal frameworks are a moving target and so will be easier to maintain separately, including for those current described in the spec.

@SebastianZimmeck
Copy link
Member

I suggest going further and moving the entire section to the explainer. As the original issue discussed, legal frameworks are a moving target and so will be easier to maintain separately, including for those current described in the spec.

Good point, @chrisn. Since a number of people expressed this preference, that is what we are going to do, i.e., move the legal details to the explainer, keep some general remarks in the spec itself, and (non-normatively) link to the explainer from the spec.

I'll merge these changes now so that we have a clean slate to make these changes in the spec and explainer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants