Mention nonsense twitter post

docs/about/privacytools.en.md

@@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ Things appeared to be going smoothly, and most of our active community made the
 
 Roughly a week following the transition, BurungHantu returned online for the first time in nearly a year. Rather than apologize for his prolonged absence, he immediately went on the offensive and complained on Reddit about the SEO damage to “his domain” and how the project was “stolen” from him. He subsequently deleted many of his posts when it was pointed out by the community that he had been absent and abandoned the project.
 
-Following this, he made false accusations about Jonah “stealing crypto”. BurungHantu had over a year since the alleged incident happened and not once did he ever bring it up. It was only after the Privacy Guides migration did he complain about it. This was despite PrivacyTools' [whistleblower policy](https://web.archive.org/web/20210729182903/https://wiki.privacytools.io/view/Whistleblower) under which BurungHantu should have told other senior members of the team. He has been repeatedly questioned on this by the team and the community and he has never provided an acceptable answer. This was an obvious smear campaign to muddy the waters.
+Following this, he made false accusations about Jonah “stealing crypto”. BurungHantu had over a year since the alleged incident happened and not once did he ever bring it up. It was only after the Privacy Guides migration did he complain about it. This was despite PrivacyTools' [whistleblower policy](https://web.archive.org/web/20210729182903/https://wiki.privacytools.io/view/Whistleblower) under which BurungHantu should have told other senior members of the team. He has been repeatedly questioned on this by the team [and the community](https://twitter.com/TommyTran732/status/1526153536962281474) and he has never provided an acceptable answer blocks anyone who asks.
+
+In addition to that he made a [nonsense twitter post](https://twitter.com/privacytoolsIO/status/1510560676967710728) alleging that an "attorney" had reached out to him on Twitter and was providing advice. Nothing has come of this, so we assume it was another attempt to bully us into getting his way and part of his obvious smear campaign to muddy the waters.
 
 Nobody on our team was willing to return to PrivacyTools because of BurungHantu’s historic unreliability. He claimed he wanted to continue working on privacytools.io on his own and requested that we remove the redirect from www.privacytools.io to [www.privacyguides.org](https://www.privacyguides.org).