Recommend against Nextcloud E2EE #1901
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for privacyguides ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
dngray
force-pushed
the
pr-remove_nextcloud_e2ee
branch
from
194c343
to
75739cd
Compare
dngray
added
the
c:software
|
Think this should be done. |
Closed
ghost
suggested changes
Nov 30, 2022
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Privacy Guides. There might be relevant details there: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/remove-nextcloud-e2e-recommendation/10352/20 |
ghost
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2022
|
I support this |
freddy-m
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Privacy Guides. There might be relevant details there: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/nextcloud-e2ee-broken/17817/2 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is something we should have recommended against some time ago:
It doesn't look like it's made a whole lot of progress either: