-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove unused state variable #55
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@eriktaubeneck has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent update in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
104-104
: Add an explicit type to the button element.To prevent accidental form submissions, it's best practice to specify the type of button elements explicitly, especially when their default behavior isn't intended.
- <button onClick={() => kill(IPARemoteServers)} ... + <button type="button" onClick={() => kill(IPARemoteServers)} ...Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Shouldn't redeclare 'Query'. Consider to delete it or rename it. (lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
'Query' is defined here:
Line range hint
152-152
: Add an explicit type to the button element.Similar to the previous button, this button should also have an explicit type specified to avoid unintended form submissions.
- <button onClick={flipStatsHidden} ... + <button type="button" onClick={flipStatsHidden} ...Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Shouldn't redeclare 'Query'. Consider to delete it or rename it. (lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
'Query' is defined here:
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx
[error] 26-26: Shouldn't redeclare 'Query'. Consider to delete it or rename it. (lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
'Query' is defined here:
[error] 104-107: Provide an explicit type prop for the button element. (lint/a11y/useButtonType)
The default type of a button is submit, which causes the submission of a form when placed inside a
form
element. This is likely not the behaviour that you want inside a React application.
Allowed button types are: submit, button or reset
[error] 152-155: Provide an explicit type prop for the button element. (lint/a11y/useButtonType)
The default type of a button is submit, which causes the submission of a form when placed inside a
form
element. This is likely not the behaviour that you want inside a React application.
Allowed button types are: submit, button or reset
Additional comments not posted (1)
server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-1
: Use of "use client" directive.This directive ensures that the code is executed only on the client side, which is appropriate for React components that heavily interact with browser APIs or require a DOM. This is a good practice in Next.js applications.
Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Shouldn't redeclare 'Query'. Consider to delete it or rename it. (lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
'Query' is defined here:
server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx
Outdated
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ import { StatsComponent } from "@/app/query/view/[id]/charts"; | |||
import { getQuery, Query } from "@/data/query"; | |||
|
|||
export default function Query({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential issue with redeclaring 'Query'.
The static analysis tool flagged a potential redeclaration of 'Query'. This could lead to confusing bugs if different parts of the code assume 'Query' refers to different things.
- const query: Query = await getQuery(params.id);
+ const fetchedQuery: Query = await getQuery(params.id);
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Shouldn't redeclare 'Query'. Consider to delete it or rename it. (lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
'Query' is defined here:
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ import { | |||
import { StatsComponent } from "@/app/query/view/[id]/charts"; | |||
import { getQuery, Query } from "@/data/query"; | |||
|
|||
export default function Query({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) { | |||
const [query, setQuery] = useState<Query | null>(null); | |||
export default function QueryPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised the linter didn't flag that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
me too! it's apparently not illegal, just bad form. (but that's kind of what you'd expect from a linter...)
very small little change here, but noticed this was unused so cleaning it up.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Query
component for better performance and maintainability.