Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Now that we have a refactored pr_fs_have_access() function, we can up… #433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2017
Merged

Now that we have a refactored pr_fs_have_access() function, we can up… #433

merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2017

Conversation

Castaglia
Copy link
Member

…date

mod_facl to reuse that code, rather than duplicating it.

@Castaglia
Now that we have a refactored pr_fs_have_access() function, we can up…
95f3785 
…date

mod_facl to reuse that code, rather than duplicating it.
@Castaglia Castaglia self-assigned this Feb 26, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.2% when pulling 95f3785 on facl-use-have-access into 0ba0882 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.2% when pulling 95f3785 on facl-use-have-access into 0ba0882 on master.

@Castaglia Castaglia merged commit 31b6a22 into master Feb 26, 2017
@Castaglia Castaglia deleted the facl-use-have-access branch February 26, 2017 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Castaglia Castaglia

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Castaglia @coveralls