Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RayCluster mutating webhook #530

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

astefanutti
Copy link
Contributor

Includes #522

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from astefanutti. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@astefanutti astefanutti requested review from KPostOffice, VanillaSpoon and sutaakar and removed request for MichaelClifford and tedhtchang April 17, 2024 14:50
kind: Service
metadata:
name: webhook-service
namespace: openshift-operators
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
namespace: openshift-operators
namespace: system


rayclusterlog.V(2).Info("Adding OAuth sidecar container")
// definition of the new container
newOAuthSidecar := corev1.Container{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it have sense to limit Resources for oauth container?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, for the sake of keeping that PR from growing too big, I'd suggest to add that in a separate PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@sutaakar sutaakar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@VanillaSpoon
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@Bobbins228 Bobbins228 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@astefanutti astefanutti merged commit 4a7cb60 into project-codeflare:main Apr 17, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@astefanutti astefanutti deleted the pr-35 branch April 17, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants