docs: add versioned docs

[salaxander]

Signed-off-by: Xander Grzywinski xandergr@microsoft.com

Add versioned docs starting with v0.1.x

Closes #15

[CodeMonkeyLeet]

Just questions for my understanding:

• Should we be using the v?.?.x versioning name? It looks like once Docusaurus spits out a versioned copy, those are expected to be frozen. If we only want to publish doc versions per minor update, then it feels like we should just do v?.?, which leaves open the possibility that we may publish v?.?.? revision to correct something particularly egregious in the minor version of the docs.

• Is the intention that the docusaurus versions are locked against the release versions? Just thinking about whether we should integrate the doc versioning with the release automation.

[sozercan]

+1 on adding to release automation

[salaxander]

@sozercan how does Eraser do the release automation? I couldn't find anything in the repo that looked like it tied the docs to newly released versions via automation

[sozercan]

@salaxander it is defined here: https://github.com/Azure/eraser/blob/main/.github/workflows/release-pr.yaml#L69 it's part of initial release pr generation.

https://github.com/Azure/eraser/blob/main/Makefile#L301

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (e37f477) compared to base (6b62ec2).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #20   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           27        27           
=========================================
  Hits            27        27           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[CodeMonkeyLeet]

Looks generally good to me, thanks for adding the automation in - see comment about the v0.1.x version though.

[CodeMonkeyLeet]

LGTM, thanks!