Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add codeql scanning #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

CodeMonkeyLeet
Copy link
Contributor

Enable GitHub CodeQL scanning for this repo.

Signed-off-by: Simon Leet simon.leet@microsoft.com

Signed-off-by: Simon Leet <simon.leet@microsoft.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (69cfa9d) compared to base (6b62ec2).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #33   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           27        27           
=========================================
  Hits            27        27           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

# The branches below must be a subset of the branches above
branches: [ "main" ]
schedule:
- cron: '27 20 * * 5'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why so specific? 😀

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, this is from the autogenerated template: I was curious about this as well, but it seems they generate a new random value for each template, so I assume it's to help spread out their scanning workload over the course of the week.

@CodeMonkeyLeet CodeMonkeyLeet merged commit 6d0d88c into project-copacetic:main Feb 13, 2023
@CodeMonkeyLeet CodeMonkeyLeet deleted the add_codeql branch February 13, 2023 17:40
ashnamehrotra pushed a commit to ashnamehrotra/copacetic that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
Signed-off-by: Simon Leet <simon.leet@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants