feat(sync): skip already synced images in sync ondemand #1234
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1234 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.95% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 93 93
Lines 20477 20426 -51
==========================================
- Hits 18408 18374 -34
+ Misses 1560 1547 -13
+ Partials 509 505 -4
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
peusebiu
changed the title
peusebiu
force-pushed
the
sync_skip_on_demand_images
branch
3 times, most recently
from
12ff447
to
3d6d340
Compare
liangyuanpeng
previously approved these changes
Mar 3, 2023
Signed-off-by: Petu Eusebiu <peusebiu@cisco.com>
peusebiu
force-pushed
the
sync_skip_on_demand_images
branch
from
3d6d340
to
ea9ffb3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue does this PR fix:
#1208
What does this PR do / Why do we need it:
If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs showing the issue:
Testing done on this change:
Automation added to e2e:
Will this break upgrades or downgrades?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.