-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sync: Add a new flag to enforce syncing only signed images, closes #455 #456
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #456 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.10% 84.41% +0.30%
==========================================
Files 50 51 +1
Lines 10375 10548 +173
==========================================
+ Hits 8726 8904 +178
+ Misses 1290 1287 -3
+ Partials 359 357 -2
📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more |
e88e902
to
e211598
Compare
0be1a20
to
5178320
Compare
32b5d67
to
969b814
Compare
969a1fc
to
8b342b3
Compare
8b342b3
to
7d06794
Compare
…oject-zot#455 sync: When checking if a image is already synced also check for changes in upstream signatures. Signed-off-by: Petu Eusebiu <peusebiu@cisco.com>
7d06794
to
a949f4a
Compare
Too many things happening in this PR?
Let's split it like above in 3 separate commits in this PR |
Ok, I will split it into 3 commits |
a949f4a
to
513c431
Compare
…imports Signed-off-by: Petu Eusebiu <peusebiu@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Petu Eusebiu <peusebiu@cisco.com>
513c431
to
a27c42c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
sync: When checking if a image is already synced also check for changes in upstream signatures.
Signed-off-by: Petu Eusebiu peusebiu@cisco.com
What type of PR is this?
Which issue does this PR fix:
What does this PR do / Why do we need it:
If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs from IPAMD/CNI showing the issue:
Testing done on this change:
Automation added to e2e:
Will this break upgrades or downgrades. Has updating a running cluster been tested?:
Does this change require updates to the CNI daemonset config files to work?:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.