Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] Injection marker rework for fuzzing #347

Closed
ehsandeep opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #348
Closed

[feature] Injection marker rework for fuzzing #347

ehsandeep opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #348
Assignees
Labels
Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Milestone

Comments

@ehsandeep
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As of now, when doing fuzzing, we define payload variables and call it using variable name wishing requests which sometimes get confusing.

Current flow:-

- payloads:
      test: wordlist.txt

    attack: sniper

    raw:
      - |
        GET /test HTTP/1.1
        Host: {{Hostname}}
        User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:79.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/79.0
        Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*
        Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
        Referer: {{BaseURL}}

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Add unique marker when using the variable name in the request, some like §variable_name§

- payloads:
      test: wordlist.txt

    attack: sniper

    raw:
      - |
        GET /§test§ HTTP/1.1
        Host: {{Hostname}}
        User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:79.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/79.0
        Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*
        Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
        Referer: {{BaseURL}}
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added the Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. label Oct 9, 2020
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added this to the 2.1.2 milestone Oct 9, 2020
Mzack9999 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2020
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 linked a pull request Oct 11, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants