New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use plain OM::XML::Document without the datastream #306
Conversation
This looks good to me — the build errors can probably be fixed with: https://github.com/projecthydra/hydra-works/blob/06d5cba043b1bfdb1e7570ec189cc446cc01e3fe/.travis.yml#L9-L10 |
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |spec| | |||
spec.add_dependency 'hydra-pcdm', '>= 0.8' | |||
spec.add_dependency 'hydra-derivatives', '~> 3.0' | |||
spec.add_dependency 'hydra-file_characterization', '~> 0.3', '>= 0.3.3' | |||
spec.add_dependency 'active-fedora', '~> 11.0.0.rc7' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this PR require AF 11, or would it work without this constraint? I'm concerned about forcing AF 11 on folks before we have tooling in place for them to deal with unordered values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need this? This will force everyone to use rdf 2
. Is there any reason it wouldn't work with version 10?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I required AF 11 so I could reproduce the original missing constant AF::OmDatastream error, but a datastream-less implementation should work fine under AF 10.
@jcoyne I removed the AF constraint, although I haven't tested this with Sufia master, it should fix the OmDatastream error. |
👏 |
This supports ActiveFedora 11 and removes the dependency on OmDatastream.