Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running pronto results with segmentation fault #68

Closed
simicic opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Running pronto results with segmentation fault #68

simicic opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@simicic
Copy link

simicic commented Feb 16, 2015

Hi!

I came across an issue that makes the pronto run task fail miserably - with segmentation fault.
The error message can be seen in this gist: https://gist.github.com/simicic/60f84a1f6187c0ec6e1c

Checking it in deep I saw it comes from the rugged gem - I can report an issue there as well, but let me first ask, how come that a single rename of a class (class name and file name) breaks pronto?

The task is running after the test suit on Circle CI and I could detect what actually caused the failure - or at least I like to think so. After the commit that changes the file name - things started to go wrong.
I tried to clear the cache for running the task, update both pronto and rugged to the latest version but nothing seem to be helping...
(Running Ruby 2.0.0-p353, also tried with 2.1.0-p95, Pronto: 0.4.1, Rugged: 0.21.4, Github Formatter )

I would appreciate any help - maybe I am doing something wrong?

@mmozuras
Copy link
Member

@simicic hi, thanks for reporting!

Could you create a test repository with which anyone else could reproduce it too?

@mmozuras mmozuras self-assigned this Feb 16, 2015
@mmozuras mmozuras added the bug label Jun 13, 2015
@mmozuras
Copy link
Member

@simicic maybe it's this issue: #103 ?

@mmozuras
Copy link
Member

Assuming that it was #103 and closing.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants