Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIP Review]: FIP0047 Review - PoRep security policy #67

Open
dmc314 opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[FIP Review]: FIP0047 Review - PoRep security policy #67

dmc314 opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
FIP Review Official (or soon to be) FIPs that require analysis

Comments

@dmc314
Copy link
Contributor

dmc314 commented Dec 12, 2022

Request Summary

please review FIP-0047 - PoRep security policy

Note that this is an Accpeted FIP and core devs are actively considering to finalize this FIP in the next immediate upgrade, currently targeted in Feb, 2023. For engineering development and upgrade planning, we'd appreciate insights from CEL before EOY!

Note from @anorth Note that this mechanism can be implemented now without needing to commit to parameters to adopt in case of an emergency. I think CEL attention is valuable, but modelling and simulations etc are about, e.g., selecting an appropriate termination fee

Audience / Consumer for this Review

Core Developers

Timeframe

Needed in 1 month

Rationale

No response

Desired Deliverables

No response

Additional Information

No response

Contact Details (if Private Response Requested)

No response

@dmc314 dmc314 added the FIP Review Official (or soon to be) FIPs that require analysis label Dec 12, 2022
@dmc314 dmc314 assigned dmc314 and SHSRPL and unassigned dmc314 Dec 12, 2022
@dmc314
Copy link
Contributor Author

dmc314 commented Dec 12, 2022

@SHSRPL , @tmellan , noting this issue here on our github for tracking purposes. Can you please update the issue with the relevant links, results, etc as they become available and close the issue when complete?

cc @jennijuju @irenegia @lucaniz @Kubuxu

@dmc314 dmc314 changed the title [FIP Review]: [FIP Review]: FIP0047 Review - PoRep security policy Dec 12, 2022
@dmc314
Copy link
Contributor Author

dmc314 commented Jan 10, 2023

Released analyses of FIP-0047 around fixing PoRep bugs in #cryptoeconomics slack channel. Concluded that a ProofRefreshWindow of approximately 30-60 days is optimal for making resealing more economically viable than not resealing. See the report for details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FIP Review Official (or soon to be) FIPs that require analysis
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants