Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#253: Get messages implementation improvement #286

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 23, 2021

Conversation

iliax
Copy link
Contributor

@iliax iliax commented Mar 18, 2021

To discuss: currently I placed RecordEmitter-related classes in ConsumingService, which is not looking pretty, imho.
I think it is better to extract RecordEmitter as top level class to "polling" package and place all related classes into it

Ilya Kuramshin added 2 commits March 18, 2021 15:11
2. Tests for OffsetsSeek, RecordEmitter added
@iliax iliax requested a review from germanosin March 18, 2021 14:45
@workshur workshur linked an issue Mar 18, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
Ilya Kuramshin added 4 commits March 23, 2021 11:23
…_RecordEmitter_improvement

� Conflicts:
�	kafka-ui-api/src/main/java/com/provectus/kafka/ui/service/ClusterService.java
�	kafka-ui-api/src/main/java/com/provectus/kafka/ui/service/ConsumingService.java
�	kafka-ui-api/src/test/java/com/provectus/kafka/ui/AbstractBaseTest.java
�	kafka-ui-api/src/test/java/com/provectus/kafka/ui/producer/KafkaTestProducer.java
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 23, 2021

@germanosin germanosin merged commit 992e8b0 into master Mar 23, 2021
@germanosin germanosin deleted the ISSUE-253_RecordEmitter_improvement branch March 23, 2021 11:55
javalover123 pushed a commit to javalover123/kafka-ui that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
* 1. End offsets check added to RecordEmitter
2. Tests for OffsetsSeek, RecordEmitter added

* Tests improvements

* ISSUE-257: checkstyle

* ISSUE-257: withSchemaType sonar fix

* ISSUE-257: withSchemaType sonar fix

Co-authored-by: Ilya Kuramshin <ikuramshin@provectus.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Get messages implementation improvement
3 participants