Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SL1S time estimate incorrect for slower tilting #8421

Closed
2 tasks
murk-sy opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks

SL1S time estimate incorrect for slower tilting #8421

murk-sy opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@murk-sy
Copy link

murk-sy commented Jun 23, 2022

Description of the bug

When slicing a file in a custom material, I noticed that the estimate was 1h15m in the slicer, however on the printer it immediately showed an estimate of 2 hours.

Further investigation revealed that selecting slow tilt does not affect time estimate.

Project file & How to reproduce

  1. Select 0.05 Normal, Prusament Resin Tough Prusa Orange, and Original Prusa SL1S SPEED settings
  2. Create a 10 mm box and disable supports and pad (this is for time reproduction)
  3. Slice
  4. Time estimate is 18m 1s
  5. Under Material Settings > Material printing profile > Print speed, instead of Fast, select Slow
  6. Time estimate is incorrect and you can't manually reslice.
  7. Change support settings back and forth so you can reslice
  8. Time estimate is 18m 1s, even though it should be 500 seconds longer (2.5s fast-slow difference * 200 layers), so 26m 21s

Checklist of files included above

  • Project file
  • Screenshot

Version of PrusaSlicer

2.4.2

Operating system

Windows 10 x64

Printer model

SL1S

@stepikovo
Copy link

This should be fixed in 2.5.0

@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Jun 29, 2022

Implemented in PrusaSlicer 2.5.0-alpha2. Closing.

@bubnikv bubnikv closed this as completed Jun 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants