Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Mega Tracking] Align Codebase to Spec v0.4 #1707

Closed
terencechain opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

[Mega Tracking] Align Codebase to Spec v0.4 #1707

terencechain opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@terencechain
Copy link
Member

terencechain commented Feb 25, 2019

This issue tracks the overall progress of updating the current beacon chain implementation to spec v0.4 Here is what has been done so far and the missing steps:

Phase 0 Beacon Chain Spec

馃崻 Features:

Descriptions Eth2.0 spec PR Prysm PR
refactor signature hashing to use new unified ssz method 633
max list size in get_permuted_index 634
reduce genesis slot to 2**32 655
simpler is_power_of_two implementation 674 #1684
specify lexicographic ordering of crosslink_data_root 676
allow transfers from both non-activated and exited validators 678

馃悰 Bugs:

Descriptions Eth2.0 spec PR Prysm PR
fix out-of-bounds in get_shuffling 641
fix slot range for attestation inclusion 669 #1715
fix previous epoch logic 672 #1721
fix handling of bad proof of possession in deposit 689 N/A
minor bugs related to ordering/typos/var-mismatch/etc 648 650 654 656 664 661 #1723

馃悩 Misc:

Descriptions Eth2.0 spec PR Prysm PR
validator slashed and initiated_exited to booleans 658
rename shard_block_root -> crosslink_data_root 662 #1743
minor formatting/typos/etc PRs 640 640 643 646 666 N/A

Phase 0 validator spec

Descriptions Eth2.0 spec PR Prysm PR
fix epoch start lookup 671 #1674
make getting assignments more generic 673 #1746

Simple Serialize

`

Descriptions Eth2.0 spec PR Prysm PR
unified method for signature hashing 625
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant