New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unmarshal Block instead of State #5246
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
28ebaee
unmarshal block instead of state
nisdas 897dcea
add fallback
nisdas 5ddf187
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] c4c3002
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] f08cb34
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] c0d4c88
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 57fa8be
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] d803030
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 8f15891
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 5d52f44
Merge refs/heads/master into dontUnmarshal
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We actually started out by using block. But one very good feedback from @prestonvanloon: what if the block is missing then the node will never be able to delete the state
I know the state is slower, I think the compromise (later) is to add a
root->slot
storageThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an issue during sync, unmarshalling a state just to delete it is quite inefficient. If a block is missing, then how would we save its resulting state ?
i could add a fallback to retrieve the state in the event the block is missing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just preparing for the worst case (ie, user saves the state then mistakenly deletes the block.. etc)
fallback sounds good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok done, added in a fallback