Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve symbolic coverage of the standard library types #2

Open
pschanely opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Improve symbolic coverage of the standard library types #2

pschanely opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@pschanely
Copy link
Owner

pschanely commented Oct 19, 2019

This is a tracking issue that we will likely never mark resolved.

Much of the data types in the Python standard library is implemented in C; such implementations cannot use symbolic inputs. In these cases, symbolic values have to materialize into concrete values, exploding the search tree and generally turning CrossHair into a naive, very slow fuzz tester.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant