Unify docstring detection #4095
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JelleZijlstra
commented
Dec 10, 2023
| @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ def lines_with_leading_tabs_expanded(s: str) -> List[str]: | |||
| ) | |||
| else: | |||
| lines.append(line) | |||
| if s.endswith("\n"): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was necessary so that we don't remove the newline at the end of a module docstring.
hauntsaninja
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4094.
We had two slightly different ways to detect docstrings. This preview feature unifies the two.
There are at least two concrete behavior changes: