Test-Retest Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks from the Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL)
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 CC
Study 1 examined the reliability of a broad spectrum of indicators (Initial Time Thinking, ITT; Execution Time, ET; Full Time, FT; Extra Moves, EM; No Go Errors, NGE; Reaction Time for Go Responses, RTGR) across an eight-week delay in a sample of 21 young adults. Before analyses, the raw results of not normally distributed variables were transformed, and results were corrected for multiple comparisons and correlations.
Included files:
- Dataset: “Data of test-retest reliability for TOL and GNG” (xls, sav).
- Syntax: “Syntax for test-retest reliability for TOL and GNG” for all performed calculations (sav).
- Calculators (xls):
- “Calculator for standard error of the difference by Iverson” of SDiff
- “Holm correction for multiple comparisons”
- “Holm correction for ICC”
- “Holm correction for multiple correlations”
- "Calculator for effect size”
Study 2 investigated factor structure of general indicators (Initial Time Thinking, ITT; Extra Moves, ET; Extra Moves, EM; No Go Errors, NGE; Reaction Time for Go Responses, RTGR) in the TOL and GNG tasks, and conducted a more detailed analysis of indicators for each trial (Initial Time Thinking, ITT; Extra Moves, ET; Extra Moves, EM) in the TOL task in the group of 95 young adults. Before analyses, the raw results of variables that were not normally distributed were trans-formed.
Included files:
- Dataset: “Data of factor structure of the TOL and GNG” (xls, sav).
- Syntax: “Syntax for factor structure of the TOL and GNG” for all performed calculations (sav).
Supplementary materials include: Table 1 Significance of p value for three indicators of Tower of London: post hoc for main effect of „Trial”, and pairwise comparisons for main effect of „Time” and for interaction between „Time” and „Trial” Table 2 Correlation matrix for TOL and GNG performance measures