Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question]: NEON Intrisics #441

Closed
Mathias-Boulay opened this issue Aug 27, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

[Question]: NEON Intrisics #441

Mathias-Boulay opened this issue Aug 27, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@Mathias-Boulay
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that ARMv7 NEON Intrisics are present in the codebase, particulary inside mathvec.c file.

Do you remember how much of an impact this made on performance ? I'm considering creating ARMv8 NEON Intrisics if the time spent is worth it.

@ptitSeb
Copy link
Owner

ptitSeb commented Aug 27, 2023

Unfortunatly, I don't remember any number. It would be nice to have ARMv8 support too, for sure.

@Mathias-Boulay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Argh, not even an order of magnitude ?
Well, I guess I can create some tests for my use case, it will take a slight while

@ptitSeb
Copy link
Owner

ptitSeb commented Aug 27, 2023

yeah, nope, sorry.it's too old, I don't remember. I did that at a time when I was putting NEON optim everywhere :)

@Mathias-Boulay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well, I'll see later and find out if I did well

@Mathias-Boulay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Chances are that I better rely on this project: https://github.com/ARM-software/optimized-routines a way or another.

@Mathias-Boulay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Side note: The android ndk does not allow neon-less compilation since a while now. I assume it now makes extensive use of the extended instructions set

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants