Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The bibtexparser package is looking for new maintainers #247

Open
dvklopfenstein opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

The bibtexparser package is looking for new maintainers #247

dvklopfenstein opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion Community input needed for choosing the direction in which pubs development should go!

Comments

@dvklopfenstein
Copy link
Contributor

dvklopfenstein commented Dec 9, 2020

Thanks for providing management of our bibliography from the command-line. What a life-saver.

Just wanted to make sure that you knew that one of pubs dependencies, the bibtexparser package, is looking for new maintainers. They note this in:

https://github.com/sciunto-org/python-bibtexparser#upgrading

Thank you again for the terrific package.

@omangin
Copy link
Member

omangin commented Jan 10, 2021

Thanks @dvklopfenstein for the insight! I am not sure that either Fabien or myself have the time to commit to such a role. Yet, given the history of the two projects being quite close (I myself contributed a few things to bibtexparser), this is a good place to look for maintainers as well! Pubs would indeed not exist without the python parser and, still today, a lot of pubs features and behaviors are directly depending on the parser's capabilities.

@omangin omangin added the discussion Community input needed for choosing the direction in which pubs development should go! label Jan 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Community input needed for choosing the direction in which pubs development should go!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants