Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uninstall pulp_docker rpms #539

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jun 13, 2018
Merged

Conversation

asmacdo
Copy link
Contributor

@asmacdo asmacdo commented Jun 7, 2018

The job builder should install these packages from source rather than
from an rpm.

https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3744
fixes: #3744

The job builder should install these packages from source rather than
from an rpm.

https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3744
fixes: #3744
ci/jjb/README.md Outdated
import ssl
context = ssl._create_unverified_context()
response = urlopen(req, context=context, timeout=self.timeout).read()
(jjb) [vagrant@pulp3 pulp-ci]$ sed -n 522,530p ~/.virtualenvs/jjb/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins/__init__.py
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This ain't Python code! Maybe change the ```python above to ```console?

- python-jenkins==0.4.16
- jenkins-job-builder==2.0.2
- jenkins-job-builder==2.0.9
- python-jenkins==1.0.1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it correct to say that you've performed an end-to-end test by communicating with Jenkins? We've experienced an issue where the default packages pulled in by pip will let jenkins-jobs test jobs succeed, but not jenkins-jobs update jobs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, I ran the update to test the changes.

@Ichimonji10
Copy link
Contributor

This PR now does much more than uninstalling pulp_docker RPMs. Is there an over-arching theme to these changes? Or are the four commits in this PR separate, and bundled together for the author's convenience?

@asmacdo
Copy link
Contributor Author

asmacdo commented Jun 12, 2018

@Ichimonji10, I've just been fixing the tests and doc builders, discovering new issues as I went. The over-arching theme is I wanted my checks to pass for pulp/pulp_docker#235, but they really are separate changes.

Copy link
Member

@dkliban dkliban left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Also adds pip install step to the output to simplify future debugging.
@asmacdo asmacdo merged commit f51ffb7 into pulp:master Jun 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants