Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[markdown-preview] Optimize re-rendering of content in a preview pane… #984

Conversation

savetheclocktower
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@savetheclocktower savetheclocktower commented Apr 21, 2024

…especially syntax highlighting.

The Problem

Suppose you’re editing a large Markdown document with lots of code blocks. Actually, don’t suppose — give it a try. Take one of my Tree-sitter blog posts and put it into a Pulsar editor in Markdown mode. Now copy everything but the front matter and paste it at the end to double its size; you should have about 50 code blocks at this point.

Now open a Markdown preview pane with Ctrl+Shift+M. Make any change at all in the buffer and notice how irritable you suddently feel:

  • In all cases, you should notice a pretty big hiccup in your editing experience.
  • When the new Markdown parser is used — i.e., when Use Original Parser is unchecked in the settings — you’ll probably even notice that the syntax highlighting on each code block flickers with every change made.

This is a big enough annoyance to make me want to hide the preview.

The culprit here is the amount of time we spend doing things with editors. As you can imagine, it’s not exactly cheap to create a new TextEditor instance for each code block whenever we re-render a preview. But the real pain is in the inserting-into-the-DOM phase; we pay a large cost in style recalculation because a very complex element is newly present on the page. The editor component commits one of the textbook “sins” of style recalculation: when the custom element is first added to the page, it reads its own offsetWidth and offsetHeight to determine whether it’s visible yet. That’s a “read” operation interleaved with a bunch of “write” operations — which the browser hates because it can no longer defer those writes until the most convenient time.

Years ago, the Atom developers realized they could use lots of new CSS tricks in order to speed up rendering and minimize style recalculation. My instinct is that a lot of those tricks work fine when the editor exists in its “natural” environment (taking up the entire width and height of a workspace pane) but not at all when the editor is in an unusual environment (existing among other elements in a static layout). But that’s just a guess.

I don’t know of an easy way to fix the underlying issue with TextEditor, but I do know of a way that we can make it not matter.

As I mentioned earlier, the main problem with markdown-preview is that the entire contents of the preview pane are replaced whenever the content changes. You don’t notice it because most of the content is the same, but it’s still a lot of work being done for what are usually very small changes. And it means that if you have 50 code blocks on a page, each one of those code blocks (and their TextEditors) is disposed of and recreated every time you type something — even something that’s outside of the code blocks altogether.

Description of the Change

If Markdown were costlier to render, we’d have had to fix this ages ago. It isn’t, so this is a problem that’s only ever cropped up in documents with lots of editors for syntax highlighting. So the fix is this:

  • Introduce DOM “diffing” so that each re-render keeps the previous content on screen and alters it as little as possible to produce the new preview.
  • Whenever a new code block appears in the preview output, create a TextEditor to represent its content instead of the pre tag. But hide the pre tag instead of removing it, because otherwise the diffing is a pain.
  • Cache the TextEditor instances and their custom atom-text-editor elements so that they don’t change during re-renders. The only cost we pay to create a new one is when a new code block appears on the page. And since the pre element references themselves don’t change — because we’re diffing HTML, not replacing it — we can cache the editors using the pre elements themselves as the keys.

This is pretty straightforward. The strangest part of this is the fact that the atom-text-editor elements will be in the output, but we have to pretend they aren’t there during the diffing phase; if we didn’t, they’d get destroyed as part of diffing, since they’re not in the Markdown output that we’re trying to imitate. Luckily, morphdom — our diffing library — makes this pretty easy. (And it adds only 5K to our bundle size.)

This strategy for minimizing the cost of syntax highlighting is useful enough that we’ll want to use it in both parser modes, which means that we’ll no longer be asking atom.ui.markdown to do our syntax highlighting for us. It’ll be worth it.

Quantitative Performance Benefits

My test was to create the document I described above — one of my blog posts, but doubled. Then I showed a Markdown preview pane and made some changes to the source outside of a text block.

Here's a “before” snapshot from a profiler. A single character change resulted in 1.5 seconds of editor lockup:

Screenshot 2024-04-20 at 10 15 26 PM

On the other hand, the “after” snapshot captures me typing an entire sentence; each keystroke results in under 100ms of work. That's still a lot, but then this is a huge document, and the dropped frames are barely noticeable. The tooltip in this screenshot describes just one of these narrower bars on the timeline.

Screenshot 2024-04-20 at 10 18 36 PM

Possible Drawbacks

The upside of our previous strategy (emptying the element and starting over every time) is that it cleans the slate between renders. Now that we’re trying to persist stuff, new edge cases emerge related to rendering.

I definitely had to do some experiments to make sure that editors are being destroyed when they ought to be, are being recreated when they ought to be, have their contents updated when they ought to, and change from one language to another when appropriate. Luckily, the existing spec suite was thorough enough to tell me exactly where I’d been remiss, and all the tests now pass.

Verification Process

Mess around in that document I had you make at the top of this ticket. Stress-test it on both master and this branch. Do the things I mentioned in the previous section; switch a js code block to a ts code block, then switch it to a tswtf code block (a language string that maps to no grammar) just to make sure it turns back into an ordinary editor with no syntax highlighting.

Applicable Issues

I pre-announced this PR in #893 in this comment that nobody really asked for.

Release Notes

  • [markdown-preview] Improve rendering performance in preview panes, especially in documents with lots of fenced code blocks.

@savetheclocktower
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

If you do the stress test I described, you might also notice another quirk of the atom.ui.markdown parser: it doesn't appear to handle HTML code blocks correctly in the preview pane, whereas the original parser does. That's a whole other ball of wax.

@savetheclocktower savetheclocktower changed the title Optimize re-rendering of content in a preview pane… [markdown-preview] Optimize re-rendering of content in a preview pane… Apr 21, 2024
@savetheclocktower
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

OK, this PR now wanders a bit outside of its scope in order to fix the HTML-encoding bug I mentioned above. I figured there was no point in putting it in a separate PR.

@savetheclocktower
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

(bump)

…especially syntax highlighting.

This change brings in `morphdom` to allow us to be more efficient about how we apply the changes needed when the Markdown source re-renders. Instead of replacing all the content with every single change, we apply only the selective edits needed to adapt our existing markup to the target markup.

Once this process is done, we introduce one `TextEditor` instance for each `pre` tag in the markup, then persist those editor elements in the rendered output so that we don't have to spend so much time creating and destroying editors. This is a _huge_ performance win, especially in documents with lots of code blocks. The editor instances are cached using the `pre` elements as keys, which is now possible because the `pre` elements themselves are preserved across re-renders.

Editors are created when new `pre` elements appear, and are destroyed when they are no longer needed, change their contents whenever the contents of the `pre` changes, and change language modes whenever the code fence language identifier changes.

This approach is now used no matter which Markdown renderer is employed; we manage syntax highlighting ourselves in all cases rather than letting `atom.ui.markdown` do it.
…because we don't need it for our use case. Helps performance.
…and make the pane appear earlier on first open.
Copy link
Contributor

@mauricioszabo mauricioszabo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments, but seems good to go :)

Co-authored-by: Maurício Szabo <mauricioszabo@users.noreply.github.com>
@savetheclocktower savetheclocktower merged commit 217313b into pulsar-edit:master May 15, 2024
103 checks passed
@savetheclocktower savetheclocktower deleted the markdown-preview-performance branch May 15, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants