Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[nodejs] Add resource registration for VpcCni #590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

justinvp
Copy link
Member

The VpcCni resource can be passed back to the TypeScript implementation from other languages as a resource reference, and needs to be instantiated as an instance of VpcCni when deserialized so it can be used in a dependsOn.

Part of #566

@github-actions
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

The `VpcCni` resource can be passed back to the TypeScript implementation from other languages as a resource reference, and needs to be instantiated as an instance of `VpcCni` when deserialized so it can be used in a `dependsOn`.
@github-actions
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ provider::

build_nodejs:: VERSION := $(shell pulumictl get version --language javascript)
build_nodejs::
rm -rf nodejs/eks/bin
rm -rf nodejs/eks/bin/*
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, deleting the whole bin dir was preventing subsequent yarn link calls in the install_nodejs_sdk target from succeeding after a prior yarn link.

@justinvp justinvp requested a review from lblackstone May 28, 2021 11:38
@github-actions
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Copy link
Member

@lblackstone lblackstone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM. Do we have any tests that cover this case?

@justinvp
Copy link
Member Author

justinvp commented Jun 8, 2021

Do we have any tests that cover this case?

We don't and I'm not sure we can yet because I hit another issue after this is fixed. Will open a new issue to track it.

@lukehoban
Copy link
Member

@justinvp Is this still needed?

@justinvp
Copy link
Member Author

justinvp commented Aug 2, 2021

Is this still needed?

Yes.

@justinvp justinvp merged commit e56aaee into master Aug 2, 2021
@pulumi-bot pulumi-bot deleted the justin/register branch August 2, 2021 23:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants