Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provider API docs show resources that aren't present in the SDK #2181

Open
Tracked by #1971
lblackstone opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #1971

Provider API docs show resources that aren't present in the SDK #2181

lblackstone opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec language/java mro2 Monica's list of 2st tier overlay related issues

Comments

@lblackstone
Copy link
Member

lblackstone commented Sep 20, 2022

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Problem description

Some resources (helm.Chart, yaml.ConfigFile, yaml.ConfigGroup, kustomize.Directory) are currently implemented as overlays rather than using the typical code generation process. These resources are not yet available in Java, but the resource documentation in the registry includes Java. These resources should include an unimplemented note to avoid confusion.

Related: #2179
Related: #2071

@lblackstone lblackstone added area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec labels Sep 20, 2022
@nstires-ctgx
Copy link

Would be super cool if they were in though! (specifically helm.Chart, yaml.ConfigFile, yaml.ConfigGroup)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec language/java mro2 Monica's list of 2st tier overlay related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants