Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sdk/python] Add ready attribute to await Helm charts #1782

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 1, 2021

Conversation

lblackstone
Copy link
Member

Proposed changes

Related issues (optional)

Part of #861

@github-actions
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2021

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2021

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

@@ -1 +1 @@
pulumi>=2.0.0,<3.0.0
pulumi>=3.0.0,<4.0.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to be >= 3.9.0 as well?

Copy link
Member Author

@lblackstone lblackstone Nov 1, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, but I figured I'd leave it as is so that it's easier to find/replace when 4.0 rolls around.

@@ -360,6 +361,34 @@ func TestHelmLocal(t *testing.T) {
}
options := baseOptions.With(integration.ProgramTestOptions{
Dir: filepath.Join(cwd, "helm-local", "step1"),
ExtraRuntimeValidation: func(t *testing.T, stackInfo integration.RuntimeValidationStackInfo) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is neat! DId you verify this fails before the fix?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep! Without the fix, both ConfigMap resources will create before the Deployment and Service.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants