Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(FACT-1345) Exclude automatic mounts on solaris #1289

Merged

Conversation

branan
Copy link

@branan branan commented Mar 16, 2016

Solaris has a concept of "automounts" that are used to transparently
map chunks of the filesystem to other filesystems, or across the
network. The number of automounted paths can become very large when a
number of zones are in use.

This patch excludes automounted paths from the mountpoints fact, so
that the fact can stay focused on mounts that an admin might actually
care about.

@branan
Copy link
Author

branan commented Mar 16, 2016

I want to hold off on merging this until we get confirmation that the exclusions look correct to somebody who knows what they're doing, but otherwise this is ready for review

Solaris has a concept of "automounts" that are used to transparently
map chunks of the filesystem to other filesystems, or across the
network. The number of automounted paths can become very large when a
number of zones are in use.

This patch excludes automounted paths from the `mountpoints` fact, so
that the fact can stay focused on mounts that an admin might actually
care about.
@branan branan force-pushed the bug/master/fact-1345-solaris-automounts branch from 42d4624 to 9ba0b63 Compare March 16, 2016 23:41
@MikaelSmith
Copy link

This looks good as an implementation. 👍

@MikaelSmith MikaelSmith changed the title (DO NOT MERGE) (FACT-1345) Exclude automatic mounts on solaris (FACT-1345) Exclude automatic mounts on solaris Mar 21, 2016
MikaelSmith pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
…omounts

(FACT-1345) Exclude automatic mounts on solaris
@MikaelSmith MikaelSmith merged commit eb17796 into puppetlabs:master Mar 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants