Fix anchor issues

[underscorgan]

No description provided.

[daenney]

Does this work/make sense, to have in the same resource declaration? Also, since the necessary resources already notify apt::update, isn't that enough?

[underscorgan]

This doesn't actually fix the issue, it just means that user's should be able to add dependencies on Class['apt::update'] or add collectors or somethign without getting dependency cycles. Do you have any brilliant ideas @daenney ?

I was trying to repro with

    include apt
    apt::ppa { 'ppa:webupd8team/java': }

    package { 'oracle-java8-installer':
        responsefile => '/tmp/java.preseed',
        require      => Apt::Ppa['ppa:webupd8team/java']
    }

[daenney]

I think this is doable. It doesn't introduce any weird half-broken anchors to support a use case so I'm okay with this.

The one thing I am confused about, what's the difference between include "apt::update" vs include apt::update? Imho that should be include ::apt::update to force a fully qualified lookup 😄.

[underscorgan]

fixed :)

[daenney]

Lets see what happens next 😉