Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for IPv6 hop limiting #152

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mcanevet
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kbarber
Copy link
Contributor

kbarber commented Apr 12, 2013

@mcanevet this needs test. Try adding rules to conversion_hash.rb to test the parser now with your new additions.

@kbarber-jenkins-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

1 similar comment
@kbarber-jenkins-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mcanevet
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kbarber I can't figure out how to limit unit tests to ip6tables provider only (as hop_limit is only relevant in IPv6).
Can anybody help me ?

@kbarber-jenkins-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@kbarber
Copy link
Contributor

kbarber commented May 1, 2013

@mcanevet someone posted a patch that contained a solution to testing in ipv6 only: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-firewall/pull/165/files its not merged in, but if you wanted to re-use that code that would be swell. Seems to work and passes tests etc.

georgkoester and others added 4 commits May 30, 2013 13:36
Adds tests for ipv6, too.

ip6tables handles fragmentation differently. There's a special
module and a couple of matchers which are all needed to
implement a stateless firewall correctly.

known_boolean handling with etc has been generified.
The known_boolean functionality was partly tailored
to the :socket feature.
@raphink
Copy link
Contributor

raphink commented May 30, 2013

@kbarber We rebased the branch on #165 and added a test for :hop_limit.

@kbarber
Copy link
Contributor

kbarber commented Jun 10, 2013

I'll close this in favour of #165.

@kbarber kbarber closed this Jun 10, 2013
@raphink
Copy link
Contributor

raphink commented Jun 10, 2013

@kbarber this PR is not equivalent to #165, it's only based on it, but still add :hop_limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants