Add support for loadbalancer member without ports

[ericlaflamme]

No description provided.

[hunner]

It looks like http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#bind shows the port being requried. Why would you not want to have a port? Does that even work?

[ericlaflamme]

The thing is that if you bind multiple ports to listen to and you specified a port for the backend, all ports will redirect to the port specified. If you don't specified any port for the backend, haproxy will send the packet to the port it received it.

Frontend:
frontend something
bind x.x.x.x:25
bind x.x.x.x:110
bind x.x.x.x:135
bind x.x.x.x:139
bind x.x.x.x:587
bind x.x.x.x:5666

backend
server server1 x.x.x.x weight 1 check port 80 inter 2000 rise 5 fall 2

[hunner]

Oh I see; interesting. Could you update the readme section also, then? https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-haproxy#ports Thanks!

[ericlaflamme]

I have updated the readme.md file, let me know what you think. Thanks :)

[underscorgan]

@eric-iweb could you squash this down to a single commit? thanks!

[underscorgan]

Thanks @eric-iweb