Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 'option' entry name in option_order hash #477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

antaflos
Copy link

@antaflos antaflos commented Apr 8, 2021

The option_order hash is used to determine the correct order of
various backend/listen configuration parameters but it contained
a misspelled "options" parameter that is really called "option". This
change fixes that and extends the spec tests for the haproxy::listen
define to catch this problem.

See the discussion in #442 for more details and the reasoning behind the
option_order hash and why option order is important in HAProxy.
Unfortunately the change in #442 also introduced the misspelled
parameter and no spec test caught it.

The `option_order` hash is used to determine the correct order of
various backend/listen configuration parameters but it contained
a misspelled "options" parameter that is really called "option". This
change fixes that and extends the spec tests for the haproxy::listen
define to catch this problem.

See the discussion in puppetlabs#442 for more details and the reasoning behind the
`option_order` hash and why option order is important in HAProxy.
Unfortunately the change in puppetlabs#442 also introduced the misspelled
parameter and no spec test caught it.
@antaflos antaflos requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2021 21:33
@daianamezdrea
Copy link

Hi @antaflos, thank you for submitting this PR! I hope the problem will be solved this time, cheers!

@daianamezdrea daianamezdrea merged commit d5a4629 into puppetlabs:main Apr 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants