We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It should be part of get() operation, like get().cursor() or get().listOfObjects() -> get().numberOfResults()
get()
get().cursor()
get().listOfObjects()
get().numberOfResults()
In fact, it's get().cursor() with returning cursor.getCount() and auto closing, but will be better to use COUNT from SQL for this
cursor.getCount()
COUNT
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Renamed get().asCursor() -> get().cursor() and get().asListOfObjects(…
1b57374
…) -> get().listOfObjects(), closes #44
Damn, I noticed incorrect issue number in commit
Sorry, something went wrong.
Done!
nikitin-da
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
It should be part of
get()
operation, likeget().cursor()
orget().listOfObjects()
->get().numberOfResults()
In fact, it's
get().cursor()
with returningcursor.getCount()
and auto closing, but will be better to useCOUNT
from SQL for thisThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: