-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jMAVSim without GUI #59
Comments
Hi, thanks for the note. I think this would be worthwhile to add. Possibly it should be consistent with the |
This would still be nice, someday. FYI @JonasVautherin. |
If I remember correctly, I tried that a few months ago. But the fix proposed here was only disabling the graphics rendering and not making it truly headless (somehow it still needed an X server to be running, so I could not run that, say, in a headless docker). |
Did this ever get resolved? I would really like to be able to run this in a headless docker. Thanks! |
@ekatzfey No, it did not. We'd happily accept a PR! Note, FWIW
|
I submitted a PR. |
Hello,
Thanks to this post: http://discuss.px4.io/t/lightweight-or-command-line-sitl-simulation-options/2285
Modifying Visualizer3D.java3, and change setVisible(true) to
setVisible(false).
I could run SITL using jMAVSim without the GUI as my low computational power computer was having troubles running it properly.
Do you know if most of PX4 users are using the graphics ?
Or if most of us are just wasting CPU with jMAVSim fency graphics...
I was wondering if we could set a parameter for this in order to be able to specify that we want to turn off graphics, without having to edit and compile jMAVSim .
Do you think it could be feasible and that some people could benefit from that ?
looking forward hearing from you.
Best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: