Fix boundary condition types - #1173
Merged
Merged
Conversation
brosaplanella
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2020
brosaplanella
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, thanks @bessman!
Member
|
Related to the |
Member
|
Thanks @bessman ! |
brosaplanella
added a commit
to brosaplanella/PyBaMM
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2020
Contributor
Author
|
@ferranbrosa I'm on develop, 87dc41a specifically. Here are the errors: |
Member
|
I think the issue is that when you installed it that command hadn't been added. Because it acts on bash, you need to install it again (no need to clone again or anything, just re-run the installation command). @tlestang is that right? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Change boundary condition type in "Creating Models" notebooks, which were incorrectly given as Dirichlet but are in fact Neumann.
Note that this change does not affect the final result of any of the notebooks; the fact that the result is independent of boundary condition type is probably a bug. See also #1174.
Type of change
Key checklist:
$ flake8$ python run-tests.py --unit$ cd docsand then$ make clean; make htmlI have one failing test (test_add_rm_param) and one which errors (test_edit_param), but on my system this is the case prior to this PR too.