-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix exit statement in Fortran with Intel compiler #1624
Fix exit statement in Fortran with Intel compiler #1624
Conversation
- added a check for epression if it is `LiteralInteger` or not - no type specifier is added for NativeInteger
Hello! Welcome to Pyccel! Thank you very much for your contribution ❤️. I am the GitHub bot. I will help guide you through the different stages necessary to validate a review in Pyccel. If you haven't yet seen our developer docs make sure you check them out here. Amongst other things they describe the review process that we have just started. You can also get in touch with our other developers on our Pyccel Discord Server. To begin with I will give you a short checklist to make sure your pull request is complete. Please tick items off when you have completed them or determined that they are not necessary for this pull request. If you want me to run any specific tests to check out corner cases that you can't easily check on your computer, you can request this using the command Please begin by requesting your checklist using the command |
@yguclu, @EmilyBourne, @bauom, please can you check if I can trust this user. If you are happy, let me know with |
This bot reacts to all comments which begin with
Beware: if you have never contributed to this repository and you are not a member of the Pyccel organisation, the bot will ignore all requests to run tests until permitted by a trusted reviewer. |
/bot trust user harsha-mangena |
@harsha-mangena It looks like the Pyccel maintainers trust you 🚀. I will now start running tests when you request them. |
Hi @harsha-mangena , are you still working on this PR? Do you need a hand or want me to complete it for you? |
Hi @EmilyBourne, I couldn't put time on this as its my end semester week, Will work on this on this weekend. |
/bot run linux |
@harsha-mangena No problem. Great news if you will have time this weekend :)
|
@EmilyBourne, |
@harsha-mangena no problem for the slow reply, especially over the holidays! |
/bot run linux intel |
/bot run intel |
/bot run intel |
Here is your checklist. Please tick items off when you have completed them or determined that they are not necessary for this pull request:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There seems to be lines in this PR which aren't tested. Please take a look at my comments and add tests which cover the new code.
If this is modified code which cannot be easily tested in this PR please open an issue to request that this code be either removed or tested. Once you have done that please leave a message on the relevant conversation beginning with the line /bot accept
and referencing the issue.
Similarly if the new code cannot be tested for some reason, please leave a comment beginning with the line /bot accept
on the relevant conversation explaining why the code can't be tested.
Unfortunately your PR is not passing the tests so it is not quite ready for review yet. Let me know when it is fixed with |
/bot run coverage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job ! Your PR is using all the code it added/changed.
The Intel compiler does not allow specifying the precision in a
stop
statement. To fix this, a condition was added in_print_SysExit
to printLiteralInteger
objects with default precision. Fixes #1554.