Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

state project maintenance status #79

Closed
ssbarnea opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

state project maintenance status #79

ssbarnea opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member

As I see that last commit was made more than 6 months ago, that there are open PRs more than two years old and that last release is was about 3 years ago, it makes me feel that the project is not maintained.

Is that true or is only deeply dormant?

The fact that it is not possible to increase complexity limit using # noqa seems like something that drives people towards dropping it. Currently there is nothing that can prevent a noqa function from increasing its complexity so, while trying to keep complexity limited you are sometimes forced to add exceptions, once added nothing will prevent them from growing, creating a vicious cycle.

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Member

It's a project with very few needs. The older PRs you point out were never going to be accepted but I never did get around to explaining that.

The fact that it is not possible to increase complexity limit using # noqa seems like something that drives people towards dropping it.

Can you point to any evidence of this? I'm not familiar with this complaint. How are you using mccabe such that it doesn't work with # noqa? How is this supposed to work in your ideal world? I'm struggling to understand what you're even asking for here.

Currently there is nothing that can prevent a noqa function from increasing its complexity so, while trying to keep complexity limited you are sometimes forced to add exceptions, once added nothing will prevent them from growing, creating a vicious cycle.

Again, I'm not following here

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the quick reply, I tried to describe my issue on #80

I am happy the see that the project is maintained. Maybe the only thing needed is to close those outdated PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants